Friday, July 01, 2016

Beware What's Lurking @Charlotte!


FAMILIES ARE NO LONGER SAFE AT THE BEACH

Kenneth Crisman, 32, from Greece

Kenneth Crisman was charged with menacing and three counts of assault. On June 26, officers responded to the rear parking lot behind 4776 Lake Avenue for several 911 calls of a large group of people fighting and people being stabbed. Officers say they found four men and a woman with cuts and puncture wounds. (WHEC )

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

The new breed of Greece residents.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't have happened if only there was a luxury hotel over there in Northeast Greece, the land the City swiped in exchange for educating Greece kids in perpetuity.

How's that Free School District working out these days taxpayers?

Anonymous said...

You're looking rough, SCATS. You should shave.

SCATS said...

To 11:32PM ~~ HEY!! It's a holiday weekend ;)

Anonymous said...

BREAKING NEWS! The word coming out of the DA's office is that the Holiday Inn Fire has been relegated to the Cold Case File. Info provided by the GPD insufficient for an indictment and lack of sufficient evidence that a crime occurred. What now?

SCATS said...

To 2:02PM ~~ Could you show us where that "news" has been reported please?

Anonymous said...

Case probably never got presented to grand jury. Doorley should resign since she can't do her job anyway. She's physically incapable now. Karma.

SCATS said...

To 9:21PM ~~ OR ... MAYBE ... Bud Phillips is as protected from the legal system as Hillary Clinton is ...

Anonymous said...

OR, Maybe it was only an ARSON in Swine 1s poluted mind when he shot his mouth off standing next to the pink camper.

EVIDENCE means a lot more than the opinion of an alcy.

Anonymous said...

You can't present a case to GJ without evidence for them to consider against someone accused of committing a crime. Actually Doorley did the right thing considering Phillips. She could have presented the case and let the GJ no bill it and moved on. Or do what she did by keeping it open hoping for a future break in the case. Maybe a death bed confession by a suspect. That is exactly what it will take to close this bogus crime thar never was.

SCATS said...

To 1:06AM & 7:10AM ~~ The EVIDENCE of trace accelerant is already established. We're NOT going to rehash that FACT again. Sorry, Bud ;)

Anonymous said...

Evidence of an accelerant certinately doesn't prove that it was an arson Fire.

SCATS said...

To 3:07PM ~~ I'll bet you even think that Bill Clinton "just happened" to bump into Lynch's plane last week, too!

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, don't try to tell me it's a rabbit.

IAFF UNION MEMBERS said...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v637/tacon1/april08/jan2014/jan2014018/13600267_10206869610127303_1281958380585742253_n.jpg

Get yer foul meowthed furry ass in the basket putitat while you still can.

Anonymous said...

There was not evidence of a trace excellent but buckets full of volatile combustibles found in a storage area. The fumes from each one in combination with each other would produce a highly combustible mixture that could be ignited by static electricity or a spark from a light switch or receptacle near by.. You like google just look it up and you w ill confirm this for yourselves. Other than what was reported in the press, you have in your possession no facts to conclude arson. Doorley knew it and that's why she never went forward and never will with facts in hand That's a fact Jack!

SCATS said...

To 4:17PM ~~ Actually, Todd Baxter addressed the issue quite well. I'll go with him.

SCATS said...

To 4:04PM ~~ OMG LMAO!!! Good one!

Anonymous said...

Scats this whole fire thing is drifted off topic somewhat. But I would add one thing.in response to your comment about Baxter. It's a known fact that this site has frequently questioned the reliability or a matter of fact, the lack of information coming from the PD. I'm afraid the explaination by Baxter fell into that area.
At the time,,two things were in play. The press hounding him for answers and the fact that he had decided to quit the job. So he responded accordingly. He told the press what they wanted to hear even though it was not quite accurate considering the evidence they did not have.
What did he care? He got the press off his back and passed the ball to Phelan whose father created the mess in the first place..
This is poetic justice of sort and application of the cliche ' What goes around, comes around. In this case to the next generation family Chiefs.

SCATS said...

To 7:26AM ~~ We get weary of saying the SAME THINGS over & over again on this BLOG, but the TRUTH MATTERS. So once again, Baxter first told us about the accelerants back in 2012, LONG BEFORE REILICH PULLED THE RUG OUT. That's one of the best things about this BLOG: It documents what happened & when. So here it is again, from Nov. of 2012:

"Now there's some additional testing that we wanted to do and is currently being done by the ATF off-site that's being done down south where they're doing a series of controlled burns for example, just to eliminate all possible other reasons. But the experts have told us and they're willing to testify in court that this is an arson fire." ~~ Greece Police Chief Todd Baxter.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure that there are just as many "experts" that are willing to testify in court that this was not an arson fire

SCATS said...

To 4:29PM ~~ Uh-huh. Baxter's have lab tests & evidence. What do yours have?? "Theories"??

Anonymous said...

Obviously the lab tests and evidence wasn't enough for the grand jury

SCATS said...

To 5:04PM ~~ Actually, THAT is up to the grand jury to decide! What's OBVIOUS is that POLITICS has tainted this case yet again.

Anonymous said...

Actually the GJ doesn't make that call as a rule.The prosecution determines if a crime has been committed under NYS Law. They hear
evidence against a suspect accused of committing the crime in order for the prosecution to move to the criminal trail phase of the law.
II this case the DA was handed a case by the GPD that did not meet at least the minimum information to make a prima facia case based solely on circumstantial evidence. Had she moved forward with what she had, she faced a civil suit charging Malicious Prosecution and defamation she did the right thing in my opinion as the GJ would have refused to indict based on what they heard.
As for Baxter he knew he was leaving the job when he made thar statement to the media . Some of us will remain in denial as to the actual circumstances surrounding this fire and the reasons no one was ever arrested and prosecuted by interjecting POLITICS into their argument as a means of justifying their own personal beliefs as to what actually happened.

SCATS said...

To 9:24AM ~~ LMAO! How the hell do you know what the DA or the police chief knew and when they knew it? You write in here and love to throw around legal & cop jargon, but that doesn't mean that you "KNOW" anything.

You better refresh your memory about Baxter. Unless he's clairvoyant, he couldn't have known his job was history MORE THAN A YEAR PRIOR to Reilich's entrance to the scene. If he IS that talented, then I guess he called it right about who set the holiday inn on fire that night ;)