Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Just Say "NO" By Just Voting "NO"


IF you can find your polling place!

SCATS ~~ We forecast a near record low turnout of only about 1200 voters.


12 comments:

Dr Stevie A said...

Ya know, if the same Skrewem Bored shovels crap long enough, eventually the Tax PAYERS get pissed and new people run for Skrewem Board.

It happened in Hilton this year.

The Crapdidates standing for reelection are facing opposition.
Union Teachers from the rich side of town are running for Hilton Bored.
A campus cop from Brockport is running for Skrewem Bored

Gee, might be new faces attached to the same old screwing soon.

Anonymous said...

And the winners are incumbents Malore and Oberg and one new face. A passed budget all the ingredients needed to continue another year
of whining on this sight. UP THE UNION down the NAY SAYERS lol

SCATS said...

To 9:47AM ~~ PLEASE don't pretend to be paying my bills with your devotion to SCATS.

Anonymous said...

Dear kitty cat. It would appear no one was influenced by your organizations call for a no vote on the budget and board members. How does that square with all of those mountains of pages of those reading your blog. I'd be interested in your spin in this regard. My own opinion is that if all those pages exist regarding readership is just that ,readership for entertainment value and not for insight or guidance on how to vote.

SCATS said...

To 1:44PM ~~ You MUST work for GCSD to be able to claim that 1788 no votes shows "no one was influenced."

Can you even balance your bank statement???

Anonymous said...

OK OK I will concede that of those 1788 no votes about 300 or so were influenced by your blog given your claimed number of FaceBook friends. The other no votes came from the usual geriatric voters who turn out year after year to vote NO on anything related to District Taxes.
These people would vote no on a tax reduction budget because they are so used to voting no without being informed their no vote is automatic. You can spin it anyway you want but one fact remains. Neither of us can prove or disprove how many of the remaining no votes were influenced by the position expressed on this site.

SCATS said...

To 6:36AM ~~ LMAO @ basing it on my number of FB friends!! We haven't posted on FB in months!!

There's been no need to post on FB, because the NUMBER OF HITS ON THIS SITE HAS GROWN REMARKABLY IN RECENT TIMES. In fact, we tallied just under 5000 hits in one 24 hr. period within the past month. That's ANOTHER new record for SCATS :)

Anonymous said...

Geeze you missed my point completely. When I referenced your Facebook friends, i implied that it would be a given that they also
would be devout followers of your site as well as your position on topics of the day. Regarding the number of hits on your site we only have your word that the numbers you project are a matter of fact .i also think it would be fair to say that many readers of this site would log on
multiple times during a 24 hour period. I myself have logged in as many as 4 times a day checking to see if new threads have been posted.and read the responses posted by some readers.I suspect others do likewise for the same reasons.In that regard I have noticed a sharp drop in topic comments with the exception of some who comment on all topics who are easily identifiable by their writing characteristics as well as the content of their personal attitudes toward topics being discussed that are consistant to a fault. I might add that more comments are probably made but don't pass muster and do not get posted.

SCATS said...

To 1:40PM ~~ You REALLY don't know what you're talking about, so typical!

There is a counter on the BLOG & it has been there for YEARS ... open to view by anyone who cares to look! Other stats are available to BLOG administration. We can see how many have viewed individual threads, how they accessed those threads (via FB, Google, Yahoo search, etc.), what browser & OS they used, yada, yada, yada.

As for comments, did it ever occur to you that MANY FOLKS READ SCATS FOR INFORMATION? We pay next to no attention to the number of comments logged, though we have stats on that, too.

Anonymous said...

INFORMATION? Surely you jest.

SCATS said...

To 1:32PM ~~ That's what people state on here. Where else can you get info on half the things we bring attention to?

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know how many millions are in the district "slush" fund?