Friday, August 01, 2014

New Poll Re: Coach Hueber



<====   New Poll

10 comments:

SCATS said...

To those who disagree about the BOE telling Hueber what info they have ~~

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THEY SHOULDN'T SHARE WITH HIM.

It's been reported that his employee reviews were without major issues. Given that, why shouldn't he learn what he did wrong?

Anonymous said...

I personally agree with the BOE!

SCATS said...

To 9:04PM ~~ Good for you, but that's pretty much a meaningless position since there's been NO discussion and NO reason given. Do you just follow the leader off the cliff in your life? Or do you have something to back up your position?

I hear crickets ...

Anonymous said...

@9:04; WHY do you agree? Without giving your reason, your response is meaningless. You have as much leg to stand on as the board right now, which is.....wait for it....nothing!

Anonymous said...

I don't have to give a reason other than I trust the BOE with the direction that they took. It is the reason why I elected the BOE! I don't need to micromanage their decision. You guys on the other hand, without any concrete evidence, have decided to accuse BOE members of collusion, which in itself is as reckless as it gets. I will bet that the coach doesn't bring a lawsuit against Greece becuase there is no case! And if he does, under what law does his non reappointment violate? Scats, you are so smart and know every thing. What law was broken and what recourse could he have?

Anonymous said...

They have discriminated against him They gave him no reason to not accept the recommended resolution. He is above the age of 40. He could grieve for age discrimination. Vanorman said the board had information the rest of us didn't. This is an implication by her and the board thru her grandstanding that there was some impropriety or malfeasance on the part of the coach applicant. This was a public declaration of some hidden and secret wrongdoing. This is defamation at best and slander at worst case. The lawyer will take the case for the coach for free since the damages will be paid by the district and the board. Unless the board throws Vanorman under the bus and disavows her shooting off her mouth, we are all going to pay the damages which the coach has the right to receive. This is a personnel issue and should not have been aired by her as she shouted to the media. Very irresponsible. And there are no actions on the part of the coach that would be considered enough to negate the recommendation of the superintendent that he be hired. In this regard the board is acting in violation of its policy that states the superintendent is responsible for hiring. this has never happened before that the board has voted to overturn the recommendation of any of our superintendents. There have been dissenting votes but never a vote that carried against the superintendent.

SCATS said...

To 9:32AM ~~ In other words, you haven't paid any attention to what's been playing out because you trust the 9 bobbleheads we call the Greece BOE!

9:55AM pretty much answers the way I would, but I'd add that the BOE Prez. McCabe stated: "I was blind-sided by Julia." THAT MEANS HE HAD NO IDEA THERE WAS ANY ISSUE!! Apparently, he wasn't alone!

YOU bring up collusion and it's VERY APPARENT that's EXACTLY what Julia has engaged in! IF she "has info the community doesn't have" then WHY DIDN'T SHE SHARE IT WITH THE BOE???

WHY DID McCABE APOLOGIZE TO HUEBER?? That was on TV camera just like Julia's shout out about having info on him. Her BIG mouth is what is going to COST US ALL as this case goes forward to a lawsuit. She has ruined his reputation with that statement. She may as well have said he was a sexual predator. Her time on the BOE is almost over, thank God!

Anonymous said...

9:04 & 9:34, thanks Julia and Adam for posting your opinions on this blog, but we already have heard them at the board meeting by you voting no.

Anonymous said...

I don;t understand why the actions of JV would result in a lawsuit against the BOE and not against her as an individual. Her statements after the vote was over and done with, had nothing to do with board business (other than to justify her own vengeful action) and were a public outburst by one individual against another. The individual should be held accountable for that outburst. She shouldn't be protected or underwritten by the BOE or the Town of Greece.

SCATS said...

To 6:56PM ~~ Possibly because she used the infamous "we" instead of "me" when making her claim. Time will tell.