Tuesday, May 20, 2014

MCSO INVESTIGATES 5 INCIDENTS ON ROADWAYS


13WHAM reports:
  • In two separate incidents, vehicles were damaged at 390 & 104 on Apr. 15th & Apr. 21st.
  • A tractor trailer was damaged May 1st at 390 & Buffalo Rd. overpass.
  • On May 14th, two vehicles were damaged by beebees (confirmed) on 490 West near the railroad overpass.

SCATS ~~ SOMETHING is wrong here! The first time we were told about any problem was when they closed 104 & 390 on April 23rd, TWO DAYS AFTER THE INCIDENT HAPPENED. On 4/29, Greece PD said they were about to close the investigation into that incident. Now, we find that the MCSO is STILL investigating that incident, along with several others? Then WHY DID GPD CLOSE THE CASE?

And exactly WHAT HAPPENED ON Apr. 15th?? Is this the case of the car with the hole in the fender? Or some other case?

It's time that our local law enforcement start telling us the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the TRUTH.
    




 

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Looks like nothing here has changed one bit with our GPD. When it comes to doing something that should be done and important. The GPD backs off from the investigations. They never follow through for truth. Why is that? They never complete a real job on important incidents or tragic accidents. If they do? We never hear anything of it. Why is that? What is their full jobs suppose to be as the GPD? They still,don't guide, serve or protect. It never ends.

Anonymous said...

1:26 They don't have to after all we have scats to tell us the TRUTH about these investigations .All we need do is read this blog and all answers to your questions will be answered.

SCATS said...

To 1:26AM ~~ It's almost as if they fear success.

To 4:59AM ~~ You are sooo overly invested in this that I'm wondering if YOU are the sniper.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Oflibber's Flunkies will bring this investigation to a quick conclusion.

Anonymous said...

You are confusing other posters here Scats. You made the same accusation about someone else in another thread, and now here again, you prove to be off course in attempting to create what may well be nothing.
I don't see many supporters of your hypotheses, and yet you continue to deny the possibility that the reality here is, until a fabrication was begun, the normal and somewhat regular occurrences of incidental collisions of stuff and cars!
Until proof of fired or thrown projectiles is asserted by victims, and thus far, none exists, this is nothing more than a really good fairy tale.

SCATS said...

To 5:41PM ~~ What accusation do you mean? For all we know, maybe YOU are the shooter.

BTW, TWO INCIDENTS WERE FROM BB's as per the MCSO ;) I think they count as projectiles.

PS ~~ Try watching tonight's local news. LOTS OF SCARED MOTORISTS ARE OUT THERE.

Anonymous said...

That silly accusation you have forced upon me because I am someone who only wants facts and disputes your hypothesis because I question the facts, stinks of the poor journalistic license and agenda you use to foment public outcry biased against public servants.
So if 2 out of 9 are BBs... Then show me the recovered projectiles and I will publicly agree that 2 have projectile induced damage! And then explain how the other 7 incidents are related to a SNIPER!
Sure motorists are scared, because they read your BLOG, watch the news, and don't have any common sense to know that 100 windshields are replaced every day in MC.
So Lucy, unless you got facts, data, and can post them here, u gotta lotta splainin' to do! If it's only loosely reported news reports - from those who want to create headlines, and nothing from PD, other than we're investigating, then you really don't have any clue or reason to report hearsay!

SCATS said...

To 4:35PM ~~ You are barking up the wrong tree, but then you already know that. Ask MCSO to show you the RECOVERED BB's. They are the ones who told the media they found BB's. In fact, they refuse to say whether the recovered pellets were from inside or outside of the vehicles shot at. But that doesn't mean they don't exist.

Unless YOU got some argument that isn't full of holes (pun intended) then please stop shooting your mouth off on here (pun intended here too). You are starting to sound dumb as rocks, also intended, but maybe not a pun ...

PS ~~ I find it BEYOND amusing that first I'm accused of only having 3-5 readers (same subject, but a different thread), but now I'm responsible for the dozens who stated to media that they are SCARED TO DRIVE LOCAL EXPRESSWAYS ... because of this BLOG! LMAO, you can't have it BOTH ways ;)

Anonymous said...

4:35 You are right on. But do yourself a favor and stop trying to say the obvious on this site. The last word belongs to Lucy.
The only reason you got posted is because you opened the door by saying people are scared because they read this blog because many in fact do. Whether or not comments here add to their fears is very pure conjecture at best.
What is more obvious about this blog is not a readership issue. What is relevant is the fact that there are few commenters on this blog as was stated on that different thread .

SCATS said...

To 10:12AM ~~ Your failed attempt to pose as someone responding to 4:35PM is pathetic at best. Worse yet is your suggestion that you "know" anything about the decisions that go into which comments are posted to this BLOG. If you actually did know anything, you'd realize that it is basic human nature to quietly agree when they see their view already expressed by others. (This BLOG is openly discussed by community members at many venues.) Thus, the limited number of editorials submitted to a newspaper.

By the way Ricky, the number of comments posted exceeded 100,000 long, long, long ago. We just don't see it as an important indicator, so we're not going to tell you how many there are currently. Of course, that doesn't include the number that are rejected for abusive language, etc.

Isn't it time to go find Baba Louie?

Anonymous said...

To 1:13 SCAT's
4:35 here.
You apparently assume way too much about my ability to spoof you, and as evidence I reference your 5:08 and 1:13 responses that accuse me of being someone posting on other threads!
10:12 is not I, nor are the posters on other threads to which you allude.

SCATS said...

To 6:21PM ~~ I never ASSume.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps you have been?!...
It's awfully quiet lately considering the extent of these incidents. What with no shootings, PD reports, or further word from all your "respected news sources".
At what time will you admit that this might well have been the hoax I suggested very early on in our chats?
We have yet to see conclusive reports, substantive evidence, victim interviews, or closure to these incidents.

SCATS said...

To 7:13PM ~~ Perhaps I've been what?

Actually, in the past week to 10 days, other incidents were discussed on craigslist, mostly in the Gates-Chili area and around Beahan Rd.

We decided the accident at Latta/Long Pond was more important, but we're definitely watching for other incidents.

How can all of that broken glass be a "hoax"??