Monday, April 22, 2013

BOE Meeting Tuesday, 6:30PM


Executive Session, 6PM ~~  to discuss collective bargaining, the employment history of particular person(s) & pending litigation.

AGENDA ITEMS of NOTE

Technology Plan Presentation (Watch your wallet alert!)

New Website Roll Out

Data Dashboard Plan Update

Program Evaluation Cycle
  

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Off topic. If you haven't heard by now, one candidate, a woman of color, turned in a petition with less than the required 87 signatures. I always thought the
board should have more diversity on it given the demographics of the town, but geeze, we don't need one more member that can't count. Also, the petitions are line numbered which adds to the question of competence as well as consciousness. Let's hope she
gets some competition as a write in, or an already bad situation will be further compounded.

SCATS said...

To 10:14AM ~~ Nope, I haven't heard. We're at an all time high for apathy about GCSD. Would this parent's initials be LA by chance?

How many petitions were turned in? Who is running? Any current BOE members seeking re-election?

If a petition doesn't have the minimum number of required VALID signatures, that person can't run anyway.

To be honest, I was hoping that fewer than 3 petitions would be returned. Then what would they do?? lol

Anonymous said...

Actually only three made the dead line including the deficient one. O'Toole will return along with a woman who ran last year and lost. SED Law provides two
remedies for the third seat. A write in candidate or if there is none, the BOE can appoint a person of their choosing for a one year term. The candidate
without the required signatures may still run as a write-in and serve a 3yr term. Interesting twist to a continuing saga. My take is that the African American lady will be a write-in and if not challenged, will win the seat with as little as one vote, easily beating out Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Clarabell and Jack Auburger to name a few of the clowns in the running.

Anonymous said...

The Tool is running again.... Help us all!

SCATS said...

Just what we don't need!

O'Toole me once shame on you!

O'Toole me twice, shame on me.

O'Tool me thrice ... GOD HELP US ALL!!!!

Anonymous said...

It is easy to meet the goals of a technology plan when that plan lacks instructional goals.

Plan: Buy stuff.
Goal: Met.

Fail.