Saturday, May 15, 2010

Let's Not Burden Jeff Smith With Another Term in Office ...

  
"I want to stick it out for three more years to help the kids, the district and the town." ~~ Jeff Smith, regarding why he seeks re-election to the Greece school board

Vote for GRINNAN & O'TOOLE
Levers 6 & 7
Tuesday May 18th

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh come now. Jeff just needs a little more rest than than most of us. What better place to get it than the GCSB.

SCATS said...

To 12:05PM ~~ Let him get it in retirement from the GCSB ;)

Anonymous said...

I wouldnt vote for gail o toole. I cant stand listening to her babble about this that and the other thing before she even thinks of making her point

SCATS said...

To 12:53PM ~~ I don't like listening to all of her personal stories either, but like it or not, three seats need to be filled. Gail is interested in replacing Achramovitch which is JOB 1 at this point in time. I prefer to go with someone I sometimes agree with than someone who will give us more of the same for another 3 yrs. I'm going with O'Toole.

Anonymous said...

I agree with SCATS. Gale O'Toole has done her homework on the board, she thoroughly researches the agenda items and studies the materials provided to the board (a lot more than can be said for Jeff Smith, who readily admits that he never reads any of the material and just goes with the flow on voting). Gale has learned from her experience and is no longer a go-along, get-along member of the Boily Bunch and as SCATS pointed out, she wants Achramovitch gone and that in itself is enough for me. VOTE FOR GALE O'TOOLE.

Anonymous said...

Gail can be a little pretentious but I believe that her heart is in the right place. Roger dodger wants her out so having her in is what we need.I have one word for Smith BOOB and not the kind we like.

I do not get the retread hippie look either get a freaking haircut. In my view he is undereducated, ill informed and not suitable to be part of the process that has spent over 700 million of our tax dollars in the last 3 years, yeah 700 million look it up.(includes capital improvement projects)

Anonymous said...

O'Toole's heart is not in the right place. All she is interested in is hearing her self talk and me and MANY other people are tired of listening to her go on and on and on.... about everything Gale. She is more then pretentious, she demeaning to many people in the town and the district. We don't need three more years of listening to her. Any by the way if you really pay attention, most of the time the homework she has done is incorrect or not related at all to the topic.

Anonymous said...

Lets look at his statement. He wants 3 more years for the "kids" "District" and "Town". Are you telling me a Senior is a "kid" or a Junior is a "Kid". How about calling them what hey are Students... This is from a current Board member.Also, what does the Town have to do with this. To me the answer is "Nothing" but it is a nice way of keeping all those Chamber and Rotary donors who give big bucks to Roger happy. I am not voting for Mr. Smith.

SCATS said...

To 6:45PM ~~ Incorrect "homework?" Please give some examples. It's easy to say someone messed up but I want specifics.

By the way, to all who don't want to vote for O'Toole: WHO DO YOU WANT INSTEAD?

Anonymous said...

A vote for Gayle is a vote for keeping the school of choice open and continued busing. Odyssey is her pet project, her kids have gone to Odyssey and she will never vote to close any school, she was an advocate for keeping WR kindergarten. And I would have to agree, she does think she is better than everyone is an idiot compared to her and she is very disrespectful. Grinnan I can endorse another 3 years of Gayle i can't. Bullet voting it is.

SCATS said...

To 8:31PM ~~ I don't disagree with a single thing you said about O'Toole. However, the fact remains that of 7 candidates, 6 will likely work to keep schools-of-choice and bussing, but 3 will be filling BOE seats. Getting rid of Achramovitch becomes the "tie-breaker" for me and my decision to back O'Toole. The status quo has got to go.

Anonymous said...

Why not Grinnan? I tend to agree with Frank Oberg so just wondering.

SCATS said...

To 4:35AM ~~ I have already stated my support for Joe Grinnan. The discussion here became about Gale O'Toole, specifically ;)