Saturday, October 10, 2009

Monroerising.com: "Supervisor Dan Maloney"


Monroerising.com ~~ "Greece Democrat Supervisor Dan Maloney ..."




SCATS ~~ Captured, before they change it ;)
  

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

A Freudian slip? Uncle Rico knows not what he is talking about!

Even though the accreditation report was after Pignato and Joseph were hired, that does not take away the fact that they were, indeed, hired by John Auberger who never bothered with any of the rules for accreditation. They just didn't catch him in the act prior to that time.

As usual, Uncle Rico has everything screwed up!

SCATS said...

To 5:08PM ~~ You see, that's the trouble with calling someone else "a liar." If you don't make sure you are perfect about all the details when you do it, you end up sounding like a moron. In this case, the shoe fits.

Anonymous said...

monroe is grunting.

Anonymous said...

hey scats
It looks like Auggie's thugs are out.
One of my lawn signs just disappeared
Guess what it wasn't an Auberger sign

SCATS said...

To 8:40PM ~~ I'm told that someone was caught by a cell phone camera using a DPW vehicle to traverse the town and remove signs from people's lawns. Sounds really desperate for Auberger, not to mention ilegal ... a felony ;)

Anonymous said...

If I was an Auberger supporter I would remove Aunerger signs so I could blame Maloney's camp for doing it. And I certainly wouldn't use DPW vehicle! So either this is an ingenious Maloney supporter, or simpleton Auberger supporter (if the DPW report is true).

Anonymous said...

Jack learned that trick from Boily. How do you think Boily got reelected to boe?

SCATS said...

To 9:20PM ~~ Your first statement is the most ridiculous suggestion I've seen on here ... and there's been some real winners!

Anonymous said...

The fact is the Republican Cronies have been touching, repositioning, and removing signs in Greece. As I ate breakfast at Olympia Restaurant, I saw a person pull out Karl Nielsen's sign and replace it with Kirk Morris. Then this person placed Karl Nielsen's sign back into the ground further back out of view. This person then twisted Nielsen's other sign on the corner. After that move, I am dropping the lever for all Dems in this election.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of vandalism.
Did you happen to read that the church where Joe M. had his forum just had a boiler room fire. Funny how these places that don't bow to Auberger seem to have problems?

SCATS said...

To 8:49AM ~~ Yes, I did read about that. Great minds think alike ;)

Anonymous said...

OMG. Maybe you all can tekk me who was on the grassy knoll.

9:20's statement makes sense to me. If you are going to be dumb enough to use a town vehicle to break the law and move/remove signs of the seated candidate's opponent, you are either really really stupid or a double agent. And if you can concoct conspiracy theories on a boiler room in the building where not even half of one percent of our town came to support Joe, you should at least entertain that thought on lawn signs.

Anonymous said...

OMG I didn't put that together. Just remembered it from the school district pilfering in the 90's. The only person that got any kind of punishment in that case (the example) was an elder at that church. Won't say his name. But they do seem to take the hits. And the now former police chief was instrumental in covering up the evidence in that case so that his buddy in the district would be ok. That buddy was finally proven to be pilfering services from the district and is gone. Small world.
Churches burning sounds like Mississippi when the "wrong people" (whoever is not in power) got too active and they were terrorized into silence. Let's hope this was just a coincidence and the fire was not set as a punishment or a warning to others to not cooperate with the new people.

SCATS said...

To 10:32AM ~~ You forget the level of arrogance we're talking about in this case. It's HUUUU-JAH!!!

Anonymous said...

One man rule brings out that kind of arrogance in this town. Legal or illegal, it doesn't matter, you just remove or destroy your opponent's signs or commit any other illegal action you please and just let anyone try to do anything about it. What are we going to do? Call the police?

This is the frustration felt by anyone trying to do the right thing and get rid of the arrogant little Jacko running this town.
Someone said it would be stupid to take down signs with a DPW truck, well you can call it stupid, I call it the arrogance of power.

I do call it stupid to be the complete and total dictator of this town and claim not to know what was going on in the Police Department. I call that not only stupid, but criminal. Jacko should be made to pay for his stupidity and arrogance.

I hope against hope that the residents of Greece have had enough and will not allow this to continue. If he is not put out to pasture in November, there will be no stopping him. They are already building the grandstand for his coronation.

Anonymous said...

Dan is desperate. Can't wait for his next press conference. He is MR. public speaker. Must be that union training.

SCATS said...

To 1:23PM ~~ I've heard Auberger & Maloney both. I can't say that Auberger is any better. He tends to stutter and stammer, especially when he's trying get people to believe the unbelievable :)

Diane said...

For Halloween I'm going out dressed as Auberger and carrying a "Vote for Dan Maloney sign"..:D.

A Bald head
some spectacles
a pathetic look w/a Pinocchio nose
and a suit stuffed with money coming out of all the pockets

Anonymous said...

Here's an Auberger story for you. About six years ago, a friend started a donut business in a plaza a Dewey and Latta next to Lake Shore School.

One day I stopped in for coffee and a donut. The owner in an effort to promte his opening, had placed a "sandwich sign" out near the sidewalk on Latta. I told him about the ordinance prohibiting these signs. He said he'd keep it there anyway until he heard from some one.

A week later, I noticed that the sign was gone. I jokingly said, "see, I told you they would catch up with you." He told me that the Friday before, the Town Supervisor came in and told him to remove the sign or he would have him arrested. I didn't believe him saying, "get outta here! What did the guy look like?" He described him as a little skinny guy, wearing a long coat, with glasses and a moustache and was driving a white Ford with 4 antennas on the roof. No doubt about it, it really was Auberger.

The messqage here is clear. Auberger is the absolute ruler of Greece, at least in his mind. Ask yourself, why would the top official stoop to that level. Why not use one of his radios to call it in to the Ordinance Enforcement Department? That's their job.

Only Auberger had the audacity to behave like this. After all, this is his Town, Right?

SCATS said...

To 6:33PM ~~ WHAT Ordinance Enforcement Dept. are you speaking of? On a similar note, I just had dinner at Famous Dave's. The now vacant Uno's property is primed for Halloween, complete with the rundown, boarded up look accented by tall weeds & overgrown shrubbery. Guess who is responsible for that property?

SCATS said...

BLOG Administration rejected publishing another comment claiming someone is lying without giving a reason for thinking it's a lie. Uncle Rico really needs to tend to his own BLOG and fix his mistakes ;)

PS ~~ I am not, nor will I ever consider YOU to be my "friend.

Anonymous said...

SCATS, that better have not been my comment about the lawn signs being moved. I shared with you very clearly why what 11:49 said wasn't true. That's what you said you wanted and that is exactly what I gave you.

If it is my comment you're refusing to put up, I sure hope you aren't just allowing Maloney supporters to get their comments up making accusations and not affording anyone else from providing clarity.

Please don't tell me you are going that route.

Feel free to comment yourself, write to "Commenter 10:41" to let me know that it was my comment you blocked.

Then I'll know. Thanks.

SCATS said...

To 10:45PM ~~ Better not have been? Or what?? Are you threatening me?

The comment I rejected was received by me at 8:11PM, not 10:41PM. I didn't get any comment at 10:41PM, so you must have all your BLOGS confused!

Anonymous said...

No one's threatening you SCATS. That phrasing was intended to be inquisitive, not accusatory.

I said to comment to 10:41 because that's what MY clock said when I was writing you and so I'd recognize you were talking to me if you said, "Commenter 10:41, yes it was your's I blocked"

I'll make it clearer, my comment was the one where I told you I saw the signs 11:49 was talking about up BEFORE the restaurant opened while driving to work but NOT the night before when I was coming home.

That means they were all put up BEFORE 11:49 claims he/she was there eating breakfast. The placed was closed when I drove by that morning.

I'm assuming you want the truth to be known. I spelled out the reason 11:49 must be mistaken and NEVER even said the words lie, liar, lying, etc.

That's why I couldn't tell if it was my comment you blocked.

SCATS said...

To 12:27AM ~~ There is NO WAY that the words "that better have not been my comment" would ever be called "inquisitive." And you did in fact say the other person wasn't telling the truth, but did NOT state why. What you said was:" I don't think so" after asking a question.
Had you said "mistaken" instead, there would have been no problem.

By the way, there is often a lag time from when you send a comment to the post time stamped by blogger on this end. It varies, sometimes by a lot. It's their technical issue, not mine.

Anonymous said...

What a bunch of whiney babies those Moron Ranters are!

I'm gonna huff, and puff, and blow your blog down!

Anonymous said...

different rules for each side dude.

Anonymous said...

Can you please just edit it then so the truth can get out?

SCATS said...

To 1:08AM ~~ I could ... but it's late, I'm falling behind on comments to moderate. If you want the truth to get out, choose your words and tone more carefully.

SCATS said...

To 1:07AM ~~ Not really. There's a big difference between saying someone "isn't telling the truth" and saying they are "mistaken." The gap just grows wider when nothing to support the accusation is provided.

Anonymous said...

SCATS:

Don't let these duds form Monroe Ranting define the debate. Anyone can give the view that since sings have been disappearing they think they know who did it.
IF the rules were that strict on opinions those tv talk crime shows where they are always convicting the accused before a trial would be off the air.

MR is using what is called the big lie technique a well known form of propaganda. Monroe rotting lies with impunity, than tries to call the other side a liar. Just shut them off.

SCATS said...

To 10:15AM ~~ Oh I would never let that happen. But there's nothing I like more than debating with someone who can't see the difference between the word "mistaken" and "didn't tell the truth." They are almost too easy to stop LOL

Anonymous said...

SCATS: You rock!!! Love your sarcasm, wit and charm. You always tell it like it is. Keep those other fools down where they belong.