Tuesday, September 15, 2009

SCATS Demystifies Auberger's Address Confusion

  
Auberger's Glossy Flier:
241 Darrington Dr.
Rochester, NY 14626
This is his rental (home) at the posh Mill Landing senior "apartment home" complex*


Monroe County GOP Website: 350 Edgemere Dr.
Rochester, NY 14612
A property he owned jointly from mid-2003 until Nov. 26, 2007. At that point in time, he deeded the property over to Joan D. Fox, the co-owner. (His home & work ph. numbers are listed on this website, but I do not know if it is current, since they use the Edgemere address.)

*From the Mill Landing website: We are a rental Community for those aged 55 and above, offering a 1300 sq. ft. Ranch style home. Your home is 2 bedrooms, 2 baths with an attached garage and screened in porch for $1,450.00 per month plus utilities and cable is $30.00 per month.

SCATS thanks our contributing artist for the handywork!
  
   

9 comments:

SCATS said...

As hard as I know it might be for a few of you, a modicum of self-control will help you to get your comment published ;)

Anonymous said...

Auberger's ship is sinking and his republican cronies are working desperately to plug the holes!

I still don't understand WHY a town wide mailing from the Supervisor of our town used his own mailing address as the return address on his mailing. One would expect a Supervisor of any town who sends out any communication to its residents would have it officially come from its town hall address.

Address aside........Augberger's actions and his constant denial of any knowledge of what transpired in our police department is beyond belief. He has to go come November. If he is that deaf, dumb and blind to the goings on and the actions of our police department he needs to go. He is too stupid to continue to be the leader of this town. We deserve better!

Anonymous said...

not to get too gossipy but was this possibly one of John's paramours gentleman love blondes or something

Anonymous said...

Isn't that the old Mr Clean?

Anonymous said...

Mill Landing is by no means "posh".

Anonymous said...

Why keep mentioning that the flyer is "glossy?" Just because Maloney isn't doing well raising money, that's his own fault. Other Democrats running in other areas in the county are doing fine and have plenty of dough.

Anonymous said...

Joan Fox is Auberger's "on again, off again" girlfriend. She works in the Assessor's office.

SCATS said...

To 6:48AM ~~ Think Teflon man LOL .. nothing sticks ... or so he likes to believe.

To 7:37AM ~~ Have you ever been inside there? I have :) Those apts. are gorgeous! With rent at $1450/mo (including only trash removal and snowplowing, not even water!), it's "posh" ... it's as good as it gets in this town!

To 7:49AM ~~ I used the term because that is how the D&C differentiated it from the letter. Since the flier has writing on one side, and since folks are so easily confuzzled, I used the word too. Capisce? ;)

Anonymous said...

7:49
When you have a print order it can be on different types of stock and glossy is a standard term. Not to imply that the paper was somehow costly and precious. Just a descriptor.
Remember postcards? It's a really big one.